← Guides

AEO in-house or with an agency: how to divide the work

Choosing between an in-house AEO specialist and an agency starts with the work you need done. Someone has to find missing information, confirm product facts, update pages and check the result. Find out which of those tasks your team can handle before choosing a provider.

AEO aims to make the answers on your site clear and accessible to search and answer systems. The practical question is who will write, publish and maintain those answers.

Identify the help your team needs

Your situationA workable arrangementCheck before starting
Editor and developer available, priorities unclearExternal audit, internal implementationWho turns findings into assigned tasks
Product facts available, no writing capacityExternal editor with an internal expertExpert availability for review
Content ready, template prevents publicationDeveloper for a defined changeReproducible issue and acceptance criteria
Frequent product updatesAn employee responsible for keeping product information currentEnough time and authority to get updates published
Nobody owns service informationAppoint an internal owner firstWho can approve customer-facing promises

This is a decision aid, not a ranking. A small site that rarely changes needs a different level of ongoing support from a product with frequent releases.

Have your team approve product and service facts

A contractor can interview experts, propose wording and identify contradictions. They should not decide what your service includes or invent product limits. Name the person who can approve those facts, with a backup when that person is away.

In the brief, assign responsibility for research, writing, factual review, development and publication. State who will perform each task and who will approve it. One person can cover several tasks, but none should be left unassigned.

Compare the full workload

Internal work uses time from editors, experts, developers and managers. External work still needs your team’s input and review. An agency quote can look inexpensive until you discover that your team must supply all the substance and write the development tickets.

Ask the provider to walk through a typical assignment: what you must supply, what you receive, how many revisions are included and what happens if information is missing. This makes the workload clearer than a promise to publish a fixed number of pages each month.

Try a small project first

Choose one service or a small section of the site. Share customer questions, existing pages and confirmed facts. Agree on the revised text, a list of any unanswered factual questions, development work if needed and a check after publication.

Assess whether the provider understands the product, explains changes and leaves editable materials. A single AI mention is not proof of team quality. Google’s advice on hiring an SEO also recommends discussing methods and the work proposed.

An audit can establish the scope. For implementation, agree which tasks the studio owns, which your team owns and who reviews the combined result.

Published: · Reviewed by the geo-rank.ai editorial team · How we check