Page access
Check HTTP responses, redirects, robots.txt, canonical URLs and internal links. Assess CDN settings and actual crawler visits where supporting data is available.
Identify technical and content issues across an agreed set of pages. Get documented findings, priorities and tasks your developers and editors can act on.
Check HTTP responses, redirects, robots.txt, canonical URLs and internal links. Assess CDN settings and actual crawler visits where supporting data is available.
Compare the initial HTML with what visitors see. Distinguish rendering issues from blocked access, server errors and login requirements.
Compare markup with visible information about services, the business, authors and terms. Identify errors and conflicting claims.
Check whether visitors have enough information to choose a service: scope, limitations, evidence of experience and a clear next step.
Check separate URLs, lang, hreflang and language switching. Flag untranslated sections and differences in service terms.
Record answers from agreed platforms using a defined set of questions, with dates and test conditions. Review traffic and indexing data when access is available.
Before starting, we agree on URLs and templates, languages and markets, platforms, questions and repeat checks. The proposal sets out the fee, timeline and deliverables. Additional languages, sections and checks require a separate scope agreement.
The audit does not change your website. Implementation, new content and ongoing monitoring are priced separately. Public checks do not require code access; analytics and server logs can support a fuller assessment if you choose to share them.
Each finding includes the page URL, observation, evidence, priority, suggested fix and acceptance criteria. Tasks are assigned to development or editorial work. Missing evidence is noted alongside the finding. Your own team can use the plan.
An actual finding on this site · 7 September 2026, before correction
On /ru/privacy/, ../assets/site.css resolved to /ru/assets/site.css and returned 404. The page loaded without the shared stylesheet.
Fix: use /assets/site.css and review other resource and navigation paths across all legal pages.
Acceptance: CSS and JavaScript return 200, the stylesheet loads, the home link opens /ru/, and language switching opens the correct document.
Share your URL, goal and priority languages. We define scope, access needs and timing.
Collect evidence, separate confirmed issues from hypotheses and prioritize the work.
Each finding includes the page URL, observation, evidence, priority, suggested fix and acceptance criteria. Tasks are assigned to development or editorial work. Missing evidence is noted alongside the finding. Your own team can use the plan.
These changes can make a site easier to access and understand. AI systems choose sources according to the query and platform; citations, rankings and lead growth cannot be guaranteed.
An audit provides findings and an action plan. Implementation is a separate engagement to update code and content. You can order an audit and have your own team make the changes.
It is an optional supporting file for specific content workflows. It does not secure citations, and Google does not use it as a ranking signal. Page access and useful content take priority.
They depend on templates, languages, review depth and implementation scope. We agree on terms before starting and discuss any additional work separately.
First, we verify that the agreed tasks are complete. We then assess available data on impressions, visits, AI answers and inquiries separately, recording the questions, platforms, dates and limitations.
Send your URL, goal and priority languages. We'll clarify the scope and suggest next steps. We reply within 1–2 business days.